- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 18:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Deepak Rawal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet notability norms. Written by himself. Previously deleted. Shyamsunder (talk) 22:54, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 05:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 05:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. No evidence of passing WP:GNG nor WP:PROF. The four previous deletions and re-creations suggest that protection is necessary. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete and salt as clearly above. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC).
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.